Should the Games Begin?
As the Olympic torch is making its controversial way around the world en route back to China, I have to wonder about the spirit in which these games will be played. It’s not uncommon to have controversy surrounding any particular nation hosting the games but this time I think that China ought to be displaying some humility that Asian people are renowned for, rather than sticking out their heads and saying that the protesters are in the wrong. As far as I was aware China had a number of “housekeeping” items it must act on as a part of being granted the Olympic games in the first place, and human rights was one of these very issues.
Tibet has been a human rights issue for a number of years, and the Olympic President is correct in saying that the games are highlighting the plight of the Tibetan people, but it’s not enough to highlight. The Olympic committee should be taking a tighter view of the “rules” they expected China to abide by and which are being so publically flaunted. China has no intention of making good on the human rights issue - this is apparent by the arrogant retorts they are making to the international press about the protesters stopping the flame.
The Olympic games is not an easy thing to take part in, it's not a set of treaure hunts that people only do in order to gain the 'gold'. It's about athletes, about honour, and about national pride, but I fear that these upcoming games is going to find that honour and pride cloaked in a cloud of secrecy, and fear of repercussions should the athletes say the wrong thing to the wrong person at the wrong time. The fact that our UK athletes were told not to make statements regarding the political situation over there during the games is a testament to the fact that our Government cares more about China than it does human rights; both of those in Tibet, and the British athletes who ought to be able to exercise their right to free speech. The fact that our Prime Minister isn’t making a stand and saying that he won’t attend the Opening Ceremony as a formal protest is despicable. As the leader of a nation where the people have a right to free speech he should be making a stand by not turning up – although it’s understandable that this is likely to be the biggest ceremony he’s likely to attend as a “head of state” and so he won’t want to give it up! How ironic that the once mighty British who defended the underdog are standing by without a murmur whilst the face lift needing French we so often condemn for their past history during the world wars are standing up for what’s right.
The Olympic Games is about the athletes but unfortunately the politics get in the way. I don’t advocate cancelling the games at this stage because that isn’t fair on the athletes who have trained so hard for their chance to compete at this level, but I do think that the rest of the world should be uniting to boycott as much as China as it can as a protest for the way they have conducted themselves once they were granted the games.



